tools: refactor shell.nix pkcs11 integration to its own section - #65404
Open
aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
tools: refactor shell.nix pkcs11 integration to its own section#65404aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
shell.nix pkcs11 integration to its own section#65404aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
jasnell
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2026
aduh95
added
author ready
panva
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purely visual changes1: put the env variable definitions inside a
envproperty, contain the pkcs11-variables to the env block (as they must not affect anything else), remove the redundant quoting.Footnotes
you can validate that by running
nix-instantiate shell.nixbefore and after the change and assert that the output is similar. ↩